Chapter 4. Full-Function Service Patrol Concept
4.1 Background, Objectives, and Scope of an FFSP
Section 2.1 provided the background on existing service patrols while
Section 3.1 discussed justification for changes to an FFSP. FHWA is
anticipating that this Handbook for an FFSP will provide a model for uniform
service across the U.S. and provide additional benefits in reducing congestion.
An FFSP program is an essential component of a regional TIM program and
serves to reduce congestion and enhance highway safety. FFSP services should
aim to reduce the impact of traffic incidents by minimizing the duration of
incidents, restoring highways to their full capacity, and applying proper
emergency TTC to enhance safety of other TIM responders and motorists involved
in incidents. An FFSP supports traffic incident response and provides motorist
assistance free of charge. Essential FFSP objectives are defined in priority
order:
- Traffic incident clearance
- Traffic control and scene management
- Incident detection and verification
- Motorist assistance and debris removal
- Traveler information.
A trained FFSP operator uses fully equipped vehicles capable of clearing an
automobile or light truck to a safe location without having to wait for a
wrecker. When vehicle crashes or stalls occur because of a weather event, the
clearance functionality is especially beneficial because private towing company
and automobile club response times can take several hours. The cleared vehicle
presents a significantly reduced hazard at the safe location, allowing a towing
wrecker to pick up the vehicle without further incident. By quickly removing
the hazard from the highway, the FFSP minimizes potential disruptions to other
motorists and reduces the risk of secondary incidents.
The FFSP operator is also sufficiently trained to provide emergency TTC at
incident scenes. This function enhances the safety of responders at the
incident scene and protects motorists passing through the scene. The traffic
control function can also include setting up, maintaining, and removing
emergency detour or alternate routes.
By patrolling the service area, the FFSP can help detect and verify traffic
incidents quickly and initiate a clearance response to motorists requiring
assistance.
The FFSP assists disabled motorists by providing gas or water, changing
tires, performing minor vehicle repairs, or by towing and/or pushing vehicles
off the roadway. The FFSP also assists motorists by providing directions,
tagging abandoned vehicles, removing debris from the roadway, providing rides
to individuals stranded on the highway, and assisting in spill clean-up.
With direct two-way communications, FFSP operators can provide updates on
traffic and roadway conditions to TMC operators as input into traveler
information systems such as 511 and/or DMS.
4.2 Operational Policies and Constraints
Funding and other political, administrative, and institutional constraints
are issues that agencies must overcome and address before implementing an FFSP
program. Specific examples include:
- Program
administration
- The
role and legal limits that an agency, such as a department of transportation,
has in responding to freeway incidents
- Various
roles and responsibilities of stakeholder agencies
- Opposition
from stakeholder agencies
- Commercial
concerns from private enterprise (towing companies, mobile tire repair centers)
- Performance
objectives and policies
- Quick
incident clearance policies
- Open
roads policies
- Operational
policies and associated program costs
- Size
of the program
- Hours
of operation
- Service
area/number of miles covered
- Number
of trucks and operators needed
- Fuel
costs
- Types
of trucks and equipment
- Types
of communications equipment
- Operator
qualifications, training, and certifications
- Dispatcher
qualifications, training, and certifications
- Political
concerns
- Legislative
approval
- Union
concerns
- An
agency’s traditional road-building needs versus operational performance.
4.2.1 Funding
Officials at existing programs routinely acknowledge identifying funding
sources as the biggest challenge in implementing an FFSP. On freeways and other
non-toll highways, service patrol programs typically have been funded through a
State’s transportation funding, from the general fund of tax- and
transportation-related fee revenue (e.g., fuel tax, vehicle registration fees),
and, when applicable, with some Federal funding split. On tollways and
turnpikes, funds for service patrols are generated from the tolls collected on
the facility it serves. In most cases, funding and spending for service patrol
programs competes with other transportation spending within the agency
sponsoring the service patrol. Typical transportation budgets may include major
capital improvements, rehabilitations, operations, maintenance, transit, and
other initiatives. When tax or toll revenues stagnate or decline, agencies are
forced to reduce spending and cut programs. As a result, service patrol programs
are constrained not only by Federal and State budgets but also by tax and toll
revenue collections. Traditional funding mechanisms for an FFSP can include:
- State
legislative appropriations
- State
operations and maintenance funds
- State
traffic and safety funds
- State
general revenue funds
- State
highway trust funds
- Public
safety funds
- Toll
revenues
- MPO
funds
- Federal
surface transportation funds
- CMAQ
funds
- National
Highway System (NHS) funds.
4.2.2 Public Private Partnership
As public agency dollars are stretched and budgets are cut, PPPs can provide
an alternative to funding mutually beneficial programs. Because FFSP programs
are free of charge to motorists and they do not compete with established towing
businesses, it is not feasible to establish a fee-based system for services
FFSP provides. Rather, private companies that benefit from exposure to
motorists, fewer crashes, and open highways will benefit from sponsoring an
FFSP. Private sponsorship of a program can expand service hours, frequency of
coverage, coverage area, and/or services provided. An example of this benefit
is State Farm Insurance Company’s 2-year sponsorship of the Road Ranger program
on the Florida Turnpike. This PPP promotes highway safety through State Farm
Insurance Company and provides free 24 hour roadside assistance along Florida’s
Turnpike. In 2004 State Farm
pledged $850,000 to the Road Rangers program to support motorist assistance. Other private funding source examples
include pharmacies, motor clubs, and wireless telephone carriers. An agency
should check State and local rules and laws to determine whether private
advertising or PPP programs are allowed to partially or fully fund an FFSP and
if not, explore options to allow such assistance.
An agency developing major transportation-based PPP programs such as high
occupancy toll (HOT) lanes or new tollway facilities often develop specific
contract terms for the financing, management, operations, level-of-service, and
maintenance of the facility for a period of time. Contract terms within these
major PPP programs should also include requirements for the developer or
concessionaire to provide an FFSP program on the facility. The result is that
the FFSP cost is enveloped in the overall program financing. This method will
benefit the public by providing the service and benefit the private company by
keeping facility traffic moving, potentially increasing toll collection
revenues from motorists using the facility because of reliable trip times.
4.2.3 Educating Decision-Makers and Stakeholders
Benefit and cost evaluations of service patrols have consistently shown
positive returns on the investment. However, some decision-makers often view
these programs as a value-added service to the basic mission of a transportation
or public works agency. As a result, funding for FFSPs can be constrained by
the support of decision-makers within the agency and by the operational mission
of the agency. Agencies attempting to implement an FFSP program should be
prepared to explain to decision-makers the benefits of quick clearance and how
FFSP programs can reduce congestion and improve safety.
4.2.4 Institutional Coordination
An important aspect in the success of an FFSP program is the involvement of
and the relationship between the TIM and traffic operations stakeholders.
Agencies should develop a multi-agency coalition and institutional framework to
support, protect, and fund the program. The coalition should include
stakeholders such as:
- State
and local law enforcement
- Fire
services
- EMS
personnel
- Departments
of Transportation
- MPO
or Association of Governments
- Local
highway/maintenance departments
- TMCs
- Media
personnel
- Towing
and recovery companies.
Because FFSP programs can provide positive impacts beyond their
jurisdictional boundaries, stakeholder agencies outside the service area or
operational responsibility should also be included. For example, safety and efficiency
improvements from an FFSP on a freeway can positively impact an arterial
network. Establishing the coalition and identifying the stakeholders should
begin in the early stages of planning an FFSP program so that each of the
stakeholder’s unique needs can be addressed. The performance of the FFSP and
partnership of the stakeholder agencies can bolster decision-making support for
the program and in turn influence decision-makers and protect program funding.
In many cases, these agencies can formalize their coalition by creating an MOU,
interagency agreements, endorsement letters, partnering agreements, or joint
operations policy statements.
Multi-agency partnerships can also provide an opportunity for agencies to
pool funding across jurisdictions to provide an FFSP. While one agency may not
be able to afford a stand-alone unit, cost sharing and oversight responsibilities
may provide enough resources for an FFSP across the jurisdictions.
4.2.5 Operational Policies and Program Cost
The operational policies of a TIM program or an FFSP program can affect the
overall budget. In basic terms, an overall program performance goal for traffic
incident clearance can drive the frequency of coverage desired, the number of
hours covered, the total service area, and the extent of the services provided.
These factors affect the overall cost of the program and needed funding.
The following constraints and operational policies affect FFSP programs:
4.2.6 Program Administration and Operational Roles
FFSP programs can be agency operated or privately contracted. When an agency
operates the program, the agency employs the service patrol operations, and the
vehicle and equipment is either leased or procured. Some advantages of an
agency-operated FFSP include:
- Having
direct control of operations and staff performance to support policies such as
open roads and quick clearance
- Changing
operational policies to be executed without contract modifications
- Developing
and maintaining staff skills within agency (whereas in a contracted service, a
change in contractor may cause the program to lose experience and training
developed over time)
- Providing
a mechanism to promote department of transportation customer service
- Avoiding
a contract review and approval process through multiple departments and
divisions of an agency.
A second alternative for implementing an FFSP is for an agency to hire a
contractor to provide patrol services. Agencies typically use their established
bidding or request for proposal (RFP) process to select a private contractor or
towing company to provide the patrol vehicles, equipment, drivers, and service.
The contract must clearly define the operational characteristics of the
program. Typically, the contract is written for bid by vehicle/service hour.
Some advantages of a contracted FFSP include:
- An
agency is not required to procure vehicles, hire personnel, procure special
insurance, or have any special resources to operate the service
- The
contractor handles the vehicle fleet and equipment maintenance
- Potential
cost savings for training can be realized if the contractor has previous
service patrol related experience.
Contracts for FFSPs should include fuel cost clauses to protect both the
vendor and agency from rising fuel costs.
4.2.7 Towing Company Constraints
An agency’s operational policy for an FFSP, whether provided in-house or by
private contractor, needs to prevent conflict with established private towing
industry businesses. Operational policies need to emphasis that the objective
of the FFSP is to clear vehicles from the highway to a safe location and not to
a service station. Furthermore, FFSP programs strictly prohibit operators from
recommending a secondary tow provider. The motorist should choose an operator
or decide from an enforcement agency’s established rotating lists. This
approach will prevent potential civil lawsuits and liability issues. An agency
can prevent misconceptions of the FFSP program by working to establish a
relationship with the local towing industry.
4.3 Description of Full-Function Service Patrols
The following subsections describe the major elements, services, and
capabilities of an FFSP.
4.3.1 Hours of Operation
Consistent with the National Unified Goal (NUG) for TIM, developed through
the National Traffic Incident Management Coalition (NTIMC), the FFSP should be
operated 24 hours, 7-days-a-week within the defined service area. The majority
of existing service patrols operate peak periods of 5:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on
weekdays, or during special events. These programs typically have focused on
the highest congestion periods and the times with the highest crash rates.
However, this focus can leave large portions of the traveling public unserved
during nonpeak hours and can sometimes be confusing for motorists expecting
service during a disablement. The 24 hours, 7-days-a-week availability of FFSP
resources will ensure that traffic incident responders can promptly and
effectively manage emergency incidents occurring on roadways regardless of time
of day or day of week.
If 24 hours, 7-days-a-week service cannot be achieved because of resource
limitations or other constraints, an agency should assess the service hours
carefully in relation to crashes, severe crashes, and recurring congestion
periods and deploy the service across the most crucial hours. The agency should
also identify what additional funding resources would be required to provide 24
hours, 7-days-a-week service and determine whether those additional resources
are obtainable. Another option is for agencies to develop an on-call system to
provide services during major incidents that occur outside normal operating
hours.
4.3.2 Service Area
From a macro perspective and consistent with the Congestion Initiative,
FFSPs should be provided in each of the top 40 urban areas of the U.S. From a State, regional, or local
perspective, the FFSP service area should be clearly defined and communicated
to stakeholders and the public. Determining the service area is based on traffic
volumes, recurring congestion areas, number of traffic incidents, calls for
service, and crash frequency. The service area should focus on high traffic
volume corridors that experience a high number of traffic incidents that increase
the magnitude of congestion. Another factor in determining the service patrol
service area is the absence of freeway shoulders where hazards are exacerbated
when crashes or stalled vehicles occur. An example of this situation is a
bridge or tunnel with limited shoulders.
4.3.3 Frequency of Coverage
The frequency of coverage is a function of the total miles patrolled in the
service area and the number of FFSP vehicles traveling the area at a given
time. Existing programs have a patrol frequency over each segment that ranges
from every 10 minutes to 1 hour. The frequency of patrols provided should
support adopted performance goals. A common TIM performance measure is incident
clearance. For example, several states have 90-minute incident clearance goals.
Alternatively, performance goals can be categorized by incident severity. In
Utah, for example, minor fender-benders have a 30-minute clearance goal while
injury crashes are 60 minutes. An FFSP program should continually patrol the
service area at a frequency that supports the performance goal and can
realistically detect and clear an incident within the clearance goal.
4.3.4 Guidelines for Developing Vehicle Requirements
Since one of the primary objectives of an FFSP is quickly clearing vehicles,
the service patrol vehicle should be capable of, or designed for, towing
vehicles. These vehicles should be flat bed models; be specially designed and
equipped with a tow sling, tow bar, tow plate or wheel lift apparatus, attached
to the rear of the vehicle; or have a crane or hoist that is attached to the
bed or frame of the vehicle. The vehicle should meet State vehicle code
requirements for light-duty tow trucks to perform accident recovery work and
have all necessary permits to operate the service. The gross vehicle weight
rating should be at least 10,000 pounds and have a manufacturer rating of one
ton or more. The FFSP vehicle capabilities are identified so that an automobile
or light truck that presents a hazard on the roadway may be moved carefully and
quickly to a safe location. This service does not provide a tow to a garage or
repair station. Quickly removing the vehicle from the incident area will
restore the roadway to its full capacity and reduce the risk of secondary
crashes. Motorists can choose a private towing company to move their vehicles
from the safe location to a service station for repair.
Requirements for FFSP vehicles should be developed depending on the needs of
the particular region. Guidelines and considerations for developing these
requirements include:
- Storage
facilities for FFSP vehicles and equipment
- Four-speed
transmission or equivalent
- Power-assisted
service brake system
- Parking
brake system
- Dual rear wheels and tires
- Crane specification – boom capacity of at least 4 tons
- Car carrier specification (if used) – bed assembly of at least 3/16-inch
steel plate and at least 15 feet in length and 7 feet in width
- Push
bumper
- Identification
markings
- Amber
warning lights and lamps; no red lights should be visible
- Work
lamps
- Portable
tail, stop and signal lamps
- Reflectors
- Splash
guards
- Attachment
chains.
4.3.5 Guidelines for Developing Equipment Requirements
To assist motorists with minor vehicle disablements and to provide emergency
TTC at incident scenes, FFSP vehicles should be equipped with an assortment of
tools and supplies to support key functions.
The following is a recommended list of equipment and supplies to carry on the FFSP vehicle:
- Communications
- Two-way
radio
- CB
radio
- Law
enforcement radio
- Public
address system
- Cellular
telephone
- Mechanical
- Air
compressor
- Car
jack
- Power-operated
winch
- Tools
- Booster
cables
- Tire
gauges
- Wrench
sets
- Socket
sets
- Hammers
- Screwdrivers
- Pliers
- Wire
cutters
- Pry
bars
- Brooms
- Shovels
- Flashlights
- Electrical
multimeters/wiring testers
- Fluids
- Gasoline
- Oil
- Transmission
fluid
- Starter
fluid
- Water
- Anti-freeze
- Supplies
- Electrical
tape
- Duct
tape
- Wire
- Absorbent
material
- Hand
cleaner
- Paper
towels
- Safety
- First-aid
kit
- Fire
extinguisher
- Gloves
- Safety
goggles
- HAZMAT
guide book
- Traffic
Control
- Vehicle-mounted
variable message or arrow sign
- Cones
- Flares
- Traffic
control signs
Another piece of important equipment for an FFSP is identifiable uniforms
for operators. A uniform will establish confidence from other TIM responders,
law enforcement, and the public that the operator is an authorized official or
representative of the agency. Operators should also be equipped with an
official, openly displayed credential to show to motorists who are hesitant or
fearful to accept the services of an FFSP.
4.3.6 FFSP Operator Visibility Requirements and Apparel
The FHWA has established a rule in Title 23 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) titled, “Part 634 Worker Visibility.” The rule requires that all workers
within the right-of-way of a Federal-aid highway wear high-visibility safety
apparel when they are exposed either to traffic (vehicles using the highway for
purposes of travel) or to construction equipment within the work area. The rule
defines workers as people on foot whose duties place them within the
right-of-way of a Federal-aid highway. This worker definition encompasses all first
responders, including FFSP operators. Part 634 also defines high-visibility safety apparel as personal
protective safety clothing that is intended to provide conspicuity during
daytime and nighttime usage, and that meets the Performance Class 2 or 3
requirements of ANSI/ISEA 107-2004. ANSI/ISEA 107-2004 is the American National Standard for Highway
Visibility Safety Apparel and Headwear. This standard provides uniform guidelines
for the design and use of high-visibility safety apparel such as safety vests,
rainwear, outerwear, trousers, and headwear to improve worker visibility during
the day, in low-light conditions, and at night. ANSI/ISEA 207-2006 is the
American National Standard for High-Visibility Public Safety vests. This
standard establishes design and use criteria for vests to make public safety
workers highly visible to motorists.
4.3.7 Procedural Development Guidelines
Each agency has unique procedures and techniques that will require
clarification in operating an FFSP. An agency should develop procedural and
operational guidelines to clarify and document those preferences and establish
a baseline performance expectation so that all operators provide a uniform and
consistent service. The guideline will also provide stakeholder agencies with a
clear illustration of the FFSP-provided services and how interactions between
the agencies and the FFSP will occur. For a privately contracted service, the
operational guidelines should be used as part of the contract documents.
Guidelines should cover the following FFSP topics:
-
Mission, objectives, roles, priorities, and functions of the program
- Contract provisions
- Operational procedures
- Duties job description, conduct
- Response priorities
- Routes, vehicle positioning, staging, leaving a scene
- Dispatching
- Communications
- Safety
- Emergency TTC
- Dealing with motorists
- Dealing with motor clubs and towing companies
- Relationships with the TMC and stakeholders
-
Safety and response procedures
- Disabled vehicles
- Abandoned vehicles
- Relocating vehicles
- Traffic crashes
- HAZMAT
- Vehicle fires
- Debris removal
- Weather
- Construction
- Applicable laws, administrative policies, agreements
- Open roads policy
- Move it law
- Liability
- ICS
- Emergency operations plans
- Evacuation
- Interagency cooperation, commitments, and relationships
- FFSP policies
- Facility
- Shift change
- Phones
- Parking
- Ride-along
- Record keeping.
4.3.8 Initial Operator Qualifications
One of the biggest challenges that FFSP programs face is driver rotation and
turnover. Large driver turnover rates will increase costs to the program as it
increases the amount of time devoted to driver training and reduces the time
drivers are operating a vehicle on the program’s service routes. FFSP programs
can reduce driver turnover and overall program cost by paying competitive wages
and hiring qualified and skilled drivers. In many cases, skills will need to be
developed through training programs; however, drivers may already have some important
skills if they have previous background in towing, automobile repair, emergency
medical services, or highway maintenance. Hiring individuals with existing
skills in automobile repair or EMS may be cost probative since these candidates
may command salaries outside the FFSP program’s budget.
Initially, drivers should have the following minimum qualifications:
- 18
years of age
- High
school diploma or General Equivalency Diploma (GED)
- Clean
criminal background
- Applicable
Commercial Driver License (CDL)
- Clean
driving record
- Ability
to work independently
- Ability
to lift 50 pounds.
4.3.9 Operator Certifications and Training
After the initial hiring, an FFSP program should require and provide
training for patrol operators before they begin service. Training should
involve a combination of classroom style and on-the-job training to demonstrate
and describe the typical functions, responses, and services that the operator
will be providing. As a guideline, the program should provide annual refresher
training to emphasize new policies, procedures, or performance concerns. Common
training elements include:
- TIM
program overview, goals, and objectives
- FFSP
operating guidelines
- Vehicle
and equipment use and maintenance
- Safety
policies
- Radio
and communication procedures
- Defensive
driving
- Ride-along
with multiple shifts
- First
aid
- CPR
- Public
relations/customer service
- Maintenance
of traffic/emergency TTC
- Vehicle
recovery procedures
- Work
site protection
- Extinguishing
vehicles fires
- Minor
vehicle repair
- ICS
consistent with NIMS
- Disaster
preparedness/evacuations
- HAZMAT
response including the Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response
Standard (HAZWOPER) administered by the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA).
Depending on the operational policies and the overall goals of the FFSP
program, the following formal certifications may further develop highly skilled
and trained operators. These certifications typically require ongoing refresher
courses and tests, and can be used to train drivers externally rather than
relying on internally developed training materials:
- International
Municipal Signal Association (IMSA), Work Zone Traffic Control Safety
- American
Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA), Traffic Control Technician
- Red
Cross, First Aid
- Red
Cross, CPR
- Department
of Homeland Security, Highway Watch
- Wreckmaster,
Towing and Recovery Operations Specialist
- National
Automotive Technicians Education Foundation, National Certified Automotive
Technician
- State
certified, Emergency Medical Technician
- State
certified, Fire Fighter
- State
certified, Animal Control Officer
- Federal
Emergency Management Association, National Incident Management System ICS-100
- Federal
Emergency Management Association, National Incident Management System ICS-200
4.3.10 Costs
As previously mentioned, the size of the program and operational policies
will drive the overall cost and annual budget. Existing service patrol programs
using private contractors range in cost per service hour from $35 to $98,
depending on the area and service vehicle used. Individual factors that
influence the overall program cost include:
- Operator
wages
- Operator
benefits
- Operator
training and certifications
- Vehicle
procurement
- Vehicle
maintenance
- Fuel
- Equipment
procurement
- Equipment
maintenance and replenishment
- Administrative
cost.
4.3.11 Communications and Dispatching
FFSP communications and dispatching should be closely integrated with TMC
operations. This is best accomplished with two-way radios, but cellular telephones
can also be used as a communication tool. Although an FFSP is routinely
patrolling the highway system, it is not reasonable to expect that the patrol
vehicle will detect all incidents. Some incidents will be detected by law
enforcement, TMC operators, or by other motorists reporting an incident to a
911 operator. As a result, the FFSP operator will typically rely on a
dispatcher to report incident locations and details to aid in quicker response.
In turn, the FFSP dispatcher will need close and convenient communications with
the TMC operators and with public safety and 911 operators. Depending on the anticipated
workloads of the TMC and public safety operators, these individuals could also
serve as the FFSP dispatcher.
Consistent with NIMS/ICS protocol, using common plain language is preferred
when communicating between the operator and dispatcher and between operators.
Communications should be limited to incident-related details and focus on the
who, what, and where of the incident. When the FFSP operator has direct linkage
to the TMC, incident situations and impacts such as lane closures can be
disseminated quickly onto DMS to provide real-time traveler information and
safety messages to motorists approaching the incident.
The close coordination required between the FFSP operator and
law-enforcement agency personnel requires two-way communications with law
enforcement. This requirement can be fulfilled by having the FFSP operator
carry a law enforcement radio. The radio may be preprogrammed with only car-to-car
channels to allow the FFSP to listen to information relayed about highway
incidents but eliminate law enforcement concerns about private communication.
More importantly, it will allow the FFSP operator to have on-scene
communications with law enforcement personnel to coordinate emergency TTC with
on-scene law enforcement officers to coordinate traffic flows and emergency
TTC. The law enforcement officer may require a shift in the emergency TTC or
may want to indicate that the scene is clear and the roadway should be opened
to traffic. When the incident scene is large, personnel may be spread out over
an extended area, and the emergency TTC may be set for an extended period of
time. Consequently, communications may not be as efficient for both parties
without two-way radios.
To further aid in communication, the FFSP cellular telephone should be
preprogrammed with important telephone numbers of potential responding
agencies, emergency management personnel, local transportation personnel,
on-call supervisors, and managers.
4.3.12 Automatic Vehicle Location
As an option, the FFSP vehicles may be equipped with an AVL system to help
inform dispatchers of the FFSP vehicle location, status, and speed. This
information can help dispatchers identify the closest and most appropriate FFSP
vehicle to respond to an incident location.
4.3.13 Record Keeping
FFSP activity should be well-documented to help identify total assist
records, driver performance, quality control, and incident reviews. The
information used to establish performance measures will help support funding
and provide key information to decision-makers.
Each FFSP operator should have log sheets and document information related
to each assist and incident. The following information should be recorded on an
activity/log sheet:
- Dispatch
time
- Arrival
time
- Departure
time
- Incident
type or nature
- Location
(mile marker, cross street, or landmark)
- Vehicle
identification number
- License
plate number and state
- Vehicle
make
- Vehicle
model
- Vehicle
year
- Vehicle
color
- Services
rendered.
Another alternative is for operators to use laptop computers similar to a
law enforcement mobile data terminal to record logs and transmit the activity
to a central database. These systems can be set up to transmit the data in
real-time and catalog entries without manual data entry.
FFSP managers should place activity logs into a database to document and
record overall program statistics. This information can be used to create
annual reports, determine trends in activity, determine activity in specific
service areas, and provide valuable information about the performance of the
overall program.
Another FFSP program record-keeping activity involves reviewing and logging
comment cards received from assisted motorists. This information can be used to
support funding, gauge public support for the service, and assess driver
performance. The comment cards require no return postage and request basic
information: the name and contact information of the assisted motorist; the
services provided to the motorist; the day, time, and location of the assist;
the general performance of the FFSP operator; and room for general comments.
4.3.14 Emergency Temporary Traffic Control
The vast majority of traffic control operations that FFSPs provide are in
emergency or short-term situations in response to traffic incidents. MUTCD
Chapters 6G and 6I address controlling traffic for TTC zone activities and
incident management areas. Because major incident durations may exceed more
than 1 hour and FFSP operations may extend into nighttime hours, the MUTCD
requires using retroreflective and illuminated devices.
The MUTCD Chapter 6I states that, “
The primary functions of TTC at a
traffic incident management area are to move road users reasonably safely and
expeditiously past or around the traffic incident, to reduce the likelihood of
secondary traffic crashes, and to preclude unnecessary use of the surrounding
local road system.” FFSP operators should be trained in safe practices for
accomplishing TTC. At incident
scenes, FFSP operators should also:
- Be
aware of their own visibility to oncoming traffic
- Move
traffic incidents as far off the traveled roadway as possible
- Provide
appropriate warning to oncoming traffic
- Estimate
the magnitude and duration of the traffic incident
- Estimate
the expected vehicle queue length
- Set
up appropriate TTC.
As guidance, the MUTCD states that warning and guide signs used for TTC
incident management situations may have a black legend and border with a
fluorescent pink background. As a basic guideline, the FFSP should carry a
truck-mounted arrow board, retroreflective cones, flares, and retroreflective
signs to set up short-term emergency shoulder or lane closures.
In emergency situations, the FFSP should use “on-hand” TTC devices for the
initial response, and the TTC devices should not create an additional hazard.
Typical applications of TTC are found in the MUTCD’s Chapter 6H and represent a
variety of conditions used for temporary work zones and maintenance operations.
It is not reasonable to expect the FFSP to be able to store and carry the types
and numbers of TTC devices (such as barriers, barrels, flashers, signs, and
arrow panels). These devices may be required for a longer-term situation on a
high-volume, high-speed facility to set up appropriate advance warnings,
tapers, or closures within the traveled way to provide an appropriate TIM responder
work space. Many of the TTC applications for shoulder, lane, etc., closures in
Chapter 6H can be emulated for long-term major incidents, but are not
reasonable for shorter-term emergency situations because the set up time of the
TTC will take longer than the clearance time of the incident. Because of the
number and types of devices required for intermediate- or long-term closures,
an FFSP should consider contacting department of transportation maintenance or
other traffic control support personnel to set up TTC that is more appropriate
for major incidents that generate longer vehicle queues. FFSP should seek
additional TTC assistance for traffic incidents that have durations estimated
as greater than 2 hours.
4.3.15 Suggested Emergency Traffic Control Procedures
4.3.15.1 Vehicle Placement
When the FFSP first arrives at a scene, the vehicle should be positioned to
protect the incident scene and prevent additional crashes. Using warning lights
and, if available, a dynamic message or arrow sign, will help establish better
visibility of the FFSP vehicle. After assessing the scene, establishing the
appropriate response, and arranging for appropriate emergency services if
needed, the FFSP should implement the on-hand traffic control devices. In cases
where no injuries have occurred and the vehicle can be moved, at the direction
of law enforcement, the FFSP should mark the vehicle(s) final resting positions
for future traffic crash investigation and relocate the vehicle to the shoulder
or another safe area.
When the FFSP is a secondary responder, similar procedures are followed, but
the FFSP operator should report to the Incident Commander (IC) and assess the
situation to determine the appropriate TTC procedures.
In most situations such as a shoulder assist or when a lane is blocked, the
FFSP should position the vehicle about two or three car lengths behind the site
and at a location that provides adequate visibility and warning to approaching
vehicles. The FFSP should take extra care not to block emergency vehicles from
maneuvering in, around, or away from the incident scene. As part of an FFSP
program, basic diagrams should be developed to illustrate the preferred
placement of the vehicle to be consistent with procedures and preferences of
TIM responder and law enforcement agencies.
4.3.15.2 Emergency Lights, Arrow Boards, Cones, and Signs
MUTCD Section 6I.05 supports using emergency vehicle lighting as an
essential action for the safety of TIM responders and persons involved in the
traffic incident. However, emergency lighting should only be considered as a
warning because it does not provide positive and effective traffic control.
Furthermore, emergency lights at night can often confuse and distract
motorists. If effective positive traffic control is established with
appropriate traffic control devices, the use of emergency lights can be reduced.
When appropriate, forward-facing emergency lights should be turned off once on
scene. Despite the guidance provided by the MUTCD, a vehicle with emergency
lights is commonly considered a traffic control device; however, a more
effective and positive traffic control procedure is to use a truck-mounted
dynamic message or arrow sign. A dynamic message or arrow sign aids in
communicating the direction road users need to take to maneuver around the
incident scene more safely and expeditiously. Using on-hand cones and signs can
provide additional advance warning, tapers, and positive traffic control in
advance of the FFSP vehicle and around the incident scene. Typically, an arrow
will indicate a positive direction away from a blocked lane while a straight line
or caution mode would indicate a shoulder closure.
When a lane is closed, vehicles in the blocked lane will need to merge with
adjacent lanes, causing disruption. Cones placed several hundred feet upstream
of the FFSP vehicle and incident scene can help move this traffic disruption
away from the immediate scene and away from TIM responders, the FFSP, and
persons involved in the incident. Traffic cones placed in a taper alignment
also help to provide positive TTC to motorists to maneuver around the scene
safely and expeditiously. In combination with traffic cones, placing warning
signs will also help emphasize the closure, provide positive guidance to
motorists, and secure the incident scene. Correctly placing cones and TTC
devices is critical in providing motorists sufficient visibility and warning to
react without creating a danger to other traffic, to TIM responders at the
scene, and to the scene itself.
After the appropriate TTC devices have been placed, the FFSP should
determine the value of providing additional positive manual traffic control at
the scene by flagging traffic around the scene. The FFSP should be trained and
qualified to provide flagging operations.
In addition to the incident scene itself, the FFSP operators should pay
attention to the back of the queue. If possible, more TTC or FFSP vehicles can
be positioned in advance of the back of the queue to provide advanced warning
to approaching vehicles. This action helps prevent secondary crashes.
4.3.15.3 Typical Emergency Traffic Control Plans
An FFSP operator should be trained and capable of quickly and safely setting
up the emergency TTC for traffic incident scenes likely to be encountered. An
FFSP should develop typical diagrams to illustrate the preferred placement of
vehicles, cones, signs, arrow boards, and flagging operations in relation to
the incident scene. The following list of typical incident situations should be
used as a guide to develop local procedures for TTC:
- Disabled
vehicle on shoulder/shoulder assist
- Single
lane closure (right or left lane)
- Center
lane blocked
- Two
lanes blocked
- All
lanes blocked
- All
lanes blocked with detour.
To quickly set up these typical closures, the FFSP should be equipped with
the following:
- Truck-mounted
dynamic message or arrow sign
- Minimum
of 16 retroreflective traffic cones
- Flares
- Flags
for flagging operations
- Retroreflective
traffic vests.
- If
space is available on the FFSP vehicle, it would assist in providing positive
traffic control by having several traffic incident management area signs as
illustrated in the MUTCD, Figure 6I-1.
4.3.16 National Incident Management System / Incident Command System
The FFSP should follow the NIMS and use the ICS for activities associated
with traffic incidents. The National Fire Service IMS Consortium published the Model
Procedures Guide for Highway Incidents, which offers an initial design
document in which an FFSP agency can work with other regional organizations to
develop and build on joint operating procedures. The procedures should apply to
routine incidents and large, complicated, and unexpected major disasters. The
FHWA has also published the Simplified Guide to the Incident Command System
for Transportation Professionals. This guide introduces ICS to those who
must provide specific expertise, aid or material during highway incidents but
who may be unfamiliar with ICS organization and operations. FFSP operators, supervisors, managers,
and administrators should be trained in using NIMS, the organizational
structure, and the unified approach concept at the core of the command and
management system. The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) NIMS
provides a template for governments to work together to prepare for, prevent,
respond to, recover from, and mitigate the effects of incidents.
Under ICS, the IC is responsible for managing all incident operations. The
first arriving unit assumes command and identifies an IC until a higher ranking
officer arrives on scene and assumes command. As such, if an FFSP is the first
arriving unit, it should assume command. Upon arrival, the law enforcement or
other TIM responder will typically assume command. The transfer of command is
announced and the former IC is reassigned to other responsibilities. Typical
responsibilities assigned to the FFSP will be traffic control duties in support
of the incident operations. When the FFSP responds to an incident as a
secondary responder (e.g., not the first arriving unit), the FFSP should follow
standard procedures in arriving at the scene and then report to the IC.
The organizational structure of ICS is modular in nature and can expand as
the complexity of the incident escalates. In more complex cases, sections and
branches may be implemented within the command organization structure, and the
FFSP may find itself reporting to a Section Chief or Branch Director rather
than directly to the IC. An FFSP operator should be prepared to be a group
leader assigned to a specific functional assignment. In most cases, the
assignment will be traffic control in and around the incident scene or on
emergency alternate routes for diverted traffic. In complex or longer duration
incidents, the FFSP operator should be prepared to elevate the situation to a
supervisor or manager and be prepared to request, organize, and assemble additional
traffic control resources.
4.3.17 Program Performance Monitoring
Measuring program performance is a critical step in monitoring its progress
and overall success. It is also critical to measure the program so agencies can
communicate the benefits and successes of the program to decision-makers,
policy-makers, sponsoring agencies, and the public.
FFSP programs should gather and record data about the number and type of
services that each service patrol operator delivers. In this manner,
statistical analysis can be used to develop trends and comparisons about service
areas, service hours, types of services rendered, times of the year, etc. When
tracked properly and linked with a dispatch center such as a TMC, statistics
should also be kept about response times, incident durations, incident
clearance times, lane blockages, and incident severity. This data will help
identify the program performance relative to its impact on quick clearance and
congestion. Lastly, the condition of the FFSP vehicles should also be monitored
by monthly inspections and data collected about vehicle miles, maintenance
needs, fuel efficiency, and equipment used.
The agency can use the compiled program data to evaluate its performance and
identify performance gaps. This data can also be used to quantify the benefit
relative to its cost in bolstering support for its continued or expanded
funding.
A basic, but important, way to monitor and track program performance is by
using comment cards/survey forms. At the end of each service call, an FFSP
should provide the assisted motorist with a self-addressed, stamped feedback/
survey card. The FFSP should maintain a record of the returned cards to gauge
and track customer satisfaction with the program. Motorists’ comments and
suggestions can be used as supporting documentation concerning the benefits of
the FFSP program and can also be used to evaluate individual drivers. Negative
comments about FFSP drivers should be investigated and, if found to be valid,
result in performance reviews, warnings, suspensions, and dismissals if
continued negative reviews are received. The survey responses should also be
used to award drivers for superior performance. In addition to citizen
feedback, driver performance should also be tracked based on monthly inspections,
crash history, and number of service calls performed.
4.4 Modes of Operation
4.4.1 Disaster Preparedness
Section 4.1 discussed the standard day-to-day operational FFSP objectives.
While current programs have different procedures and policies in place for responding
to natural disasters, an FFSP should be a key component of a region’s overall
emergency response plan relative to traffic control assistance within the
framework of the NIMS/ICS. For example, a disaster happens and an evacuation
route is implemented so keeping the route cleared of incidents becomes even
more critical than during the FFSP’s standard operating hours.
In the case of a disaster, natural or otherwise, the FFSP should maintain
its overall operational objectives and perform its normal services to keep
highway traffic moving. As part of a region’s overall plan, the FFSP should be
prepared to:
- Perform
its normal services along an evacuation route
- May
require expanding the FFSP program service area
- Assist
motorists with fuel, water, and minor repairs along an evacuation route
- Add
vehicles to facilitate traffic control
- Assist
highway patrols and public safety
- Implement
alternate route or emergency detour plans
- Assist
with contra flow traffic operations
- Block
roadway entrance and exit ramps
- Assist
with equipment support and equipment routing
- Manually
operate traffic signals.
4.4.2 Planned Special Events
Similarly, FFSP programs can facilitate traffic control and clear incidents
for planned special events. This approach may require the program to expand its
service area and service hours to provide assistance during the event.
4.5 User Involvement, Interaction, Roles, and Responsibilities
FFSPs have contact and interact with many users on the highway system.
During normal operations or major unexpected incidents, an FFSP will interact
with TIM responders from law enforcement, fire and rescue, EMS, departments of
transportation, towing and recovery companies, the media, public information
officials, travelers, and road users. Section 2.3 detailed these interactions.
In an ideal situation, an FFSP is a major component of an ongoing, sustained
TIM program. In this context, FFSPs should be regular participants in incident
debriefs and after-action reviews. Also, a TIM program can serve as the
foundation for building relationships between stakeholder agencies involved in
highway incident response and interactions with an FFSP. Other key FFSP interactions
are its communication with a regional TMC and its integration within defined
procedural guidelines of a regional TIM program. The following list explains
the general roles and responsibilities of FFSP users. Note that some roles and
responsibilities can be combined into one overall position.
-
FFSP
Operator (Driver) – Serves as the frontline contact to deliver the services,
activities, and functions of an FFSP. Operates the vehicle, patrols the
highways, coordinates with other on-scene TIM responders, and provides service
and assistance to motorists.
-
FFSP
Dispatcher – Communicates incident information to the FFSP operators. Some of
this information is likely to be relayed from other sources such as law
enforcement personnel, other motorists, or the TMC operator.
-
TMC
Operator – Monitors and operates the traffic management system. Incident
information requiring an FFSP response is relayed to the FFSP dispatcher.
Similarly, the FFSP relays information to the TMC Operator who collects
traveler information and coordinates traffic management actions.
-
FFSP
Supervisor – Administers and develops operator schedules to deliver the
services across the prescribed service area and service hours. Supervises and
monitors daily operations. Provides quality control checks, provides operator
performance reviews, and is prepared to call-in additional operators for major
incidents. Maintains employee files, training records, and activity logs.
-
FFSP
Fleet Maintenance Manager – Administers and maintains the service patrol fleet
of vehicles. Can provide vehicle and equipment inspections.
-
FFSP
Trainer – Coordinates the implementation of operator orientation and training.
Ensures that each operator complies with the training and certification
requirements.
-
FFSP
Hiring Manager – Interviews candidates and ensures potential candidates meet minimum
qualifications. Ensures that agency hiring procedures are followed. Ensures
that necessary background checks are performed concerning driver and criminal
records.
-
FFSP
Manager – Supervises overall day-to-day operations and oversight of an FFSP.
Manages the FFSP vision, direction, goals, functional description, policy,
procedural guidelines, and performance. Key participant in the overall
integration of an FFSP into a comprehensive TIM program. Establishes and
maintains partnership agreements with stakeholder agencies about operational
guidelines. If the FFSP is contracted to a private operator, this position is
likely to remain staffed by the funding agency to oversee contractual obligations
and overall program performance.
-
Law
Enforcement and Emergency Services – Works closely with law enforcement and
emergency services to assist them in making the incident scene safe and
provides positive TTC to move motorists expeditiously around the incident. Responds and assumes command of the
scene when property damage and injuries have occurred. FFSPs should be prepared
to implement emergency TTC activities as part of the overall scene management,
but also provide the IC updates about the status of activities and suggestions
for keeping traffic moving.
-
Towing
and Recovery – Required in cases where the FFSP is not able to remove vehicles
from the traveled way to a safe area. Most regions have a rotating list of
pre-qualified towing companies for specific service areas. Transportation or
law enforcement agencies maintain these lists, and the FFSP should contact
these agencies to dispatch the towing agency when appropriate.
-
All
FFSP operators and personnel shall display professional and courteous conduct
at all times. The FFSP should not accept gratuities or fees for services
rendered to motorists. FFSPs should have procedures to handle FFSP cell phone
use by motorists and guidance for transporting motorists.
4.6 Support Environment
A department of transportation, a law enforcement agency, or a privately
contracted service with a private corporation can operate an FFSP. Regardless
of the administrative mechanism for operating the FFSP, a support environment
will need to be created and maintained to ensure continued overall success.
-
Funding – Identifying the funding sources and programming money to meet anticipated
capital and operations costs is fundamental to starting, sustaining, or
enhancing a program. Section 4.2
provides guidelines for funding sources and overcoming this constraint.
-
Oversight – FFSP oversight responsibility can vary depending on the agency leading the
program and the unique organizational structure of that agency. Nonetheless,
FFSP Manager oversight will be required for an in-house or contracted service.
As part of the oversight support environment, a clear set of goals, performance
measures, procedural guidelines, training requirements, and operator
qualifications should be established to ensure sustainability and consistency
of the FFSP. Section 4.3.7 contains suggested procedural guidelines and
performance measures.
-
Facilities,
Equipment, and Maintenance – An agency operating an FFSP should anticipate
ongoing operational costs related to the maintenance and replacement of
vehicles and equipment. Section 4.3.4 addresses the vehicle and equipment
guidelines.
-
Communications – Another fundamental support system for an FFSP is the communications link
between the FFSP operator/driver and dispatcher, TMC operator, law enforcement
personnel, or other TIM responder agency. Section 4.3.11 details the two-way
radios, cellular telephones, and computer-aided-dispatch system for FFSP
communications.
-
Partnerships – An FFSP will have many interactions with other stakeholder agencies when
responding to highway incidents. These agencies are instrumental in keeping
highway traffic moving and incident-free to fight congestion. An FFSP will be
more successful when it has the collaborative support of law enforcement and
TIM responder agencies. This support environment can be formalized with a
partnering agreement, MOU, or even a mutual aid agreement. Section 2.4.7
discusses these interactions.
-
Contracting
Mechanism – When a private company provides services on behalf of an agency
sponsoring the program, the sponsoring agency will need to solicit and procure
services through a binding contract. When developing a specific contract, the
focus should be on the type of services required, goals of the program,
procedural guidelines, service area, service hours, operator and company
qualifications, experience, training, interaction with stakeholder agencies,
and equipment maintenance and replacement.
-
Outreach – A basic form of outreach is to provide assisted motorists with a comment card
or brochure. This method provides direct contacts with more information on the
service and obtains feedback from those the FFSP directly affects. With much
variation between programs in the U.S. and to a lesser extent within a region,
motorists may be easily confused by the types of services to expect, when
services are provided, and on the congestion relief benefit gained from the
program. An FFSP should develop and implement an outreach and public
information campaign to make the public aware of the program. The more aware
the public is about the program service and its benefits, the more likely the
public is to voice support and influence decision-makers to identify funding
sources for an FFSP.
4.7 Incremental Priorities
As discussed in Section 4.2, overcoming the constraints would largely be
attributed to having more funding available to the FFSP program. Assuming the
existing program already provides the basic services, additional funding will
be used on the following priorities to evolve incrementally into an FFSP over
time:
- Expand
service area, increase
mileage, add routes
- Incorporate
all freeway or turnpike miles
- Increase
support to major arterials
- Expand
service hours in existing operational service areas
- Increase
the total service hours of operation
- Add
shoulders of peak periods
- Implement
a night or weekend shift
- Operate
24 hours, 7-days-a-week
- Additional
operator capabilities and pay levels
- Improve
operator qualifications, training, certifications, and pay levels (see Sections
4.3.7 and 4.3.8)
- Provide
advancement opportunities for personnel
- Improved
skill and education levels
- Increase
number of positions for additional operators and mechanics
- Update
fleet and equipment
- Improve
fleet equipment
- Improve
radio communication
- Increase
patrol frequency
- Increase
service for an existing patrol area to reduce time for incident detection and
clearance
- Other
priorities
- Establish
outreach and marketing programs
- Establish
regional TIM teams to support local programs.
July 9, 2008
Publication #FHWA-HOP-08-031