Printable version [PDF 233 KB] You may need the Adobe® Reader® to view the PDFs on this page. Contact Information: Operations Feedback at OperationsFeedback@dot.gov
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590
November 2019
FHWA-HOP-20-007
[ Notice and Quality Assurance Statement ] [ Technical Report Documentation Page ] [ SI Modern Metric Conversion Factors ]
Executive Summary Chapter 1. Introduction Chapter 2. Overview Chapter 3. Strategic Chapter 4. Tactical Chapter 5. Support Chapter 6. Results Summary Appendix. Summary of 2019 Traffic Incident Management Capability Maturity Self-Assessment Results
Executive Summary
Chapter 1. Introduction
Chapter 2. Overview
Chapter 3. Strategic
Chapter 4. Tactical
Chapter 5. Support
Chapter 6. Results Summary
Appendix. Summary of 2019 Traffic Incident Management Capability Maturity Self-Assessment Results
Figure 1. Graph. Traffic incident management stakeholder participation in completing 2019 Traffic Incident Management Capability Maturity Self-Assessment. Figure 2. Graph. Traffic Incident Management Capability Maturity Self-Assessment national scores 2009 – 2018.
Figure 1. Graph. Traffic incident management stakeholder participation in completing 2019 Traffic Incident Management Capability Maturity Self-Assessment.
Figure 2. Graph. Traffic Incident Management Capability Maturity Self-Assessment national scores 2009 – 2018.
Table 1. Mean score for each section (Baseline and 2019). Table 2. Scoring guidance for traffic incident management training question #13. Table 3. Traffic incident management training question #13. Table 4. Traffic incident management performance measures (PM) questions with average scores below Baseline. Table 5. Top 40 major metropolitan area scores versus top 75 and non-top 75. Table 6. Traffic incident management program funding Table 7. Lowest scoring questions on 2019 Traffic Incident Management Capability Maturity Self-Assessment. Table 8. Highest scoring – Strategic. Table 9. Traffic incident management policies and procedures – highest scoring in 2019. Table 10. Traffic incident management policies and procedures – 90 percent or more scoring each question 3 or higher. Table 11. Highest scoring – Tactical. Table 12. Highest scoring – Support. Table 13. Lowest scoring questions on 2019 TIM CM SA. Table 14. Scores below Baseline. Table 15. Program areas of success as indicated by 90 percent or more scoring each question 3 or higher.
Table 1. Mean score for each section (Baseline and 2019).
Table 2. Scoring guidance for traffic incident management training question #13.
Table 3. Traffic incident management training question #13.
Table 4. Traffic incident management performance measures (PM) questions with average scores below Baseline.
Table 5. Top 40 major metropolitan area scores versus top 75 and non-top 75.
Table 6. Traffic incident management program funding
Table 7. Lowest scoring questions on 2019 Traffic Incident Management Capability Maturity Self-Assessment.
Table 8. Highest scoring – Strategic.
Table 9. Traffic incident management policies and procedures – highest scoring in 2019.
Table 10. Traffic incident management policies and procedures – 90 percent or more scoring each question 3 or higher.
Table 11. Highest scoring – Tactical.
Table 12. Highest scoring – Support.
Table 13. Lowest scoring questions on 2019 TIM CM SA.
Table 14. Scores below Baseline.
Table 15. Program areas of success as indicated by 90 percent or more scoring each question 3 or higher.
US DOT Home | FHWA Home | Operations Home | Privacy Policy
United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration