Applying Transportation Asset Management to Traffic Signals: A PrimerChapterĀ 2. BackgroundIn recent years, asset management has grown in practice at transportation agencies throughout the world. In the United States, many transportation agencies have invested in implementing asset management principles Transportation Asset ManagementTAM is used to manage the transportation infrastructure with improved decisionmaking for resource allocation. TAM processes help agencies identify programs/projects on which to spend/invest their funding for the best long-term benefit. Federal legislation, including the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) and the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act of 2012 (MAP-21), has codified asset management principles. ISTEA first established the use of management systems for roads, bridges, and other transportation assets.1 More recently, MAP-21 required all State departments of transportation (DOTs) to develop risk-based TAMPs, a requirement that is continued in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.2,3 The FHWA has implemented the asset management requirements of 23 U.S.C. 119 by promulgating the asset management rule at 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 515. The regulation defines asset management as:
Further, 23 CFR 515.7(a) requires State DOTs to develop a TAMP that describes how the agency will manage the National Highway System (NHS) to achieve system performance effectiveness and its targets for asset condition while managing risk, in a financially responsible manner, at a minimum practicable cost over the lifecycle of its assets. FHWA developed guidelines and guidance to help transportation agencies design and populate a TAMP.5 State DOT TAMPs must address eight key elements for NHS pavements and bridges.6 Although encouraged, there are no requirements for addressing traffic signals in a TAMP. Some State DOTs did include traffic signals in their first iteration of their TAMP document. If a State elects to include other NHS infrastructure assets or other public roads assets in its asset management plan, 23 CFR 515.9(l) describes the minimum information to be included, and also states that the level of effort used should be consistent with the State DOT’s needs and resources. The elements required for NHS pavements and bridges, however, provide guidance for asset management approaches for other assets, including traffic signals. The following eight elements, extrapolated from 23 CFR part 515, can also be applied to traffic signals:
Transportation Systems Management and OperationsTSMO is defined in 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(30)(A) as:
The goal of TSMO is to maintain, and where possible, restore the performance of the existing system before it needs extra capacity. An effective TSMO program enables agencies to target underlying operational causes of congestion and unreliable travel through innovative solutions that typically cost less and are quicker to implement than adding capacity. TSMO also expands the range of mobility choices available to system users, including shared mobility and nonmotorized options. Asset management works to enhance system performance with processes similar to TSMO but with a different focus. Asset management is concerned with preserving or improving the condition of assets, and TSMO focuses on preserving and maximizing safety, mobility, and reliability. However, both systems share a strategic, performance-based approach to monitoring performance and applying actions to reach targets. Transportation Performance ManagementFHWA defines Transportation Performance Management (TPM) as a strategic approach that uses system information to make investment and policy decisions to achieve performance goals. TPM provides key information to help decisionmakers understand the consequences of investment decisions across assets and improve communication of these decisions among all stakeholders.7 The TSMO, Transportation Asset Management, and Transportation Performance Management RelationshipThere is a close relationship between TPM and TAM in the Federal-aid Highway Program: both consider asset and system performance, risks, and available resources to achieve desired objectives over time. However, TPM focuses on the approach to managing transportation system performance outcomes, while asset management applies this approach to manage the condition of the infrastructure assets. Agencies should ensure their TPM approach is considered and integrated when implementing asset management as illustrated in figure 1.8 Traffic signal assets can play a critical role for an agency’s achievement of the performance outcomes for which it is responsible. To effectively perform this role, an agency needs to understand the asset investment needs for traffic signal assets to deliver those performance outcomes.
Emerging Themes in Traffic Signals Asset ManagementAs the area of traffic signals asset management continues to develop, transportation agencies seek a more developed understanding of current practices and implementation efforts. This primer is structured around five emerging themes in traffic signals asset management and uses recent, relevant examples from agencies to provide suggested implementation steps. The five themes are summarized here and further expanded upon in subsequent chapters. These themes are extrapolated from TAMP elements to assist an agency in including traffic signals in its TAMP:
These five themes, aligned to the eight TAMP elements defined by FHWA (shown in table 1), can help agencies adopt leading practices for traffic signals asset management. Each theme is further explained in the subsequent chapters, including specific examples from State DOTs and recommended action steps for implementing asset management for traffic signals. 1 See ISTEA section 1009(e)(4) (codified as amended at 23 U.S.C. 119(e)). [Return to footnote 1] 2 See MAP-21 section 1106 (codified as amended at 23 U.S.C. 119(e)). [Return to footnote 2] 3 Public Law 117-58. This document was written before the enactment of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) in November 2021. The BIL amended 23 U.S.C. 119(e)(4) to add a requirement that the lifecycle cost and risk management analysis elements of a TAMP take into consideration extreme weather and resilience, but otherwise left the statutory requirements for TAMP elements unchanged from the requirements carried forward in the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act of 2015. [Return to footnote 3] 4 23 CFR 515.5. [Return to footnote 4] 5 FHWA’s guidance on TAMP development is available at Asset Management Guidance. [Return to footnote 5] 6 23 CFR 515.9(d). [Return to footnote 6] 7 FHWA “What is TPM?” [Return to footnote 7] 8 FHWA “How TPM and Asset Management Work Together.” [Return to footnote 8] |
United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration |