The Microsoft Word version of this checklist is an editable form that can be used to support process reviews.
| Process Checklist | ||||
| Are all the bases covered? | Yes | No | Not Applicable | Comments |
| High-Level Design | ||||
| Were alternative project architectures/high level designs considered? | ||||
| Is there documented rationale for the selected project architecture/high level design? | ||||
| Are all interfaces identified and documented? | ||||
| Have industry standards been identified for the high-level design? | ||||
| Is the design clearly documented? | ||||
| Is the high-level design traceable to the system requirements? | ||||
| Do any of the requirements need to be changed based on the high-level design development effort? | ||||
| Have the integration, verification, and deployment plans been updated in the SEMP? | ||||
| Detailed Design | ||||
| Did each component have a technical review? | ||||
| Did each component design trace to a sub-system requirement? | ||||
| Were all sub-system requirements satisfied by the component design activity? | ||||
| Was a verification plan for each component defined? | ||||
| Was each component design checked for performance? | ||||
| Was the component design documentation complete, up to date, and accurate? | ||||
| Was a critical design review conducted? | ||||
| Was an alternatives analysis done on the products used in the system? | ||||
| Have all system and sub-system requirements been updated at the time of the critical design review? | ||||
