The Microsoft Word version of this checklist is an editable form that can be used to support process reviews.
| Process Checklist | ||||
| Are all the bases covered? | Yes | No | Not Applicable | Comments |
| For project scoping studies: | ||||
| Is there a validated statement of vision, goals, and objectives? | ||||
| Have constraints been collected from all key stakeholders? | ||||
| Have the evaluation criteria in comparing alternatives been selected, validated, and documented? | ||||
| Is there a comprehensive list of candidate solutions, both technical and procedural? | ||||
| Is there a comprehensive and varied list of alternative concepts? | ||||
| Is the "Do Nothing" case one of the alternatives? | ||||
| Has the comparison approach been documented and validated? | ||||
| Has the selected concept, and the rationale for its selection, been documented; and has it been reviewed by the stakeholders? | ||||
| Does the documentation satisfy relevant reporting standards, if any, for example, for a Study Report if required by the state? | ||||
| Do the conclusions and recommendations flow in a clear and defensible manner from the needs, alternatives selection, and analysis? | ||||
| For Programming (of ITS projects): | ||||
| Are ITS projects identified in the TIP (or STIP) project list? | ||||
| Have regional TIP requirements been addressed in creating the information for each project (including identification of ITS aspects of project if that is a part of the requirements | ||||
| Has relevant information from the regional ITS architecture been included in the project information in the TIP (if this is one of the regional requirements)? | ||||
| Are capital projects that include ITS elements identified in the project list? | ||||
