Text from 'Innovative Project Development and Contracting Tools' PowerPoint Presentation
Slide 1
Blank slide
Slide 2
Innovative Project Development and Contracting Tools
Work Zone Management: Driver's Impact Consideration
Slide 3
In the beginning . . . 300BC
Design & Construction Took Generations
Comic strip: cavemen counting their fingers and toes
Traffic Engineer Meeting
Slide 4
Imagine Building this Project Today
Cartoon image: Noah's ark measured at 250 cubits
First Major Transportation Project
Slide 5
Work Zone Management
- Plan Construction Alternatives Early
- Involve Community & Stakeholders
- Operations is Key to Success
- Inform Impacted Travelers
Slide 6
Plan Construction Alternatives Early
- Establish the Need for the Project - The Why?
- Address Mobility Issues - Traffic Impacts
- Evaluate all Potential Construction Alternatives
- Consider Traffic Modeling on Mega Projects
- Consider Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT Analysis)
Slide 7
Mega Project - Regional Impact
Graphic: Aerial view map showing the close proximity of 370, I-270, and I-170. Construction to these roads would impact Hazelwood and Florissant.
Slide 8
Address Why it's Needed & Mobility
Graphic: Aerial view map showing Graham, Pershall, Hanley, and Dunn streets in proximity to the single left-exit ramps to I-270.
Slide 9
Staging, Schedule & Closures
Graphic: I-170 at I-270 Interchange Improvements. Map showing the placement of proposed two-lane right-hand ramps added to the I-270/I-170 merge plus the addition of lanes to I-270.
Slide 10
1998 Traffic Counts
Graphic: Map showing 1998 traffic counts on specific interchanges. Traffic counts shown near the I-170 at I-270 interchanger were at 135,809 and 122,762. The busiest interchange in the state is located nearby and was measured at 131,157 and 178,396 in 1998.
Slide 11
Traffic Modeling Simulations
Slide 12
Evaluate Construction Alternatives
- Strengths
- Weaknesses
- Opportunities
- Threats
Slide 13
Involve Community & Stakeholders
- Engaged Cities, Community Groups
- Proposed Construction Alternatives
- "Get-In, Get-Out and Stay Out"
- Traffic Model (MITSIM, QuickZone, etc.)
- Innovative Contracting A+B+C Bidding
- Incentive / Disincentive
- Proactive in Community Concerns
Slide 14
Community Partners
Logos for community partners:
- North County Incorporated
- City of Hazelwood
- St. Louis County Highways & Traffic
- JE Jacobs Sverdrup
- MoDOT
- IDOT
- Florissant Missouri
- Florissant Missouri Police
- Metropolitan Congregations United
Slide 15
Keep 3 Lanes Open
Moveable Barrier vs. Bridge Widening
Graphic: close-up photo of a moveable barrier; Aerial view photo of placement of moveable barrier on a bridge
Slide 16
Traffic Control Plans
- Get In - Get Out - Stay Out - Phase 1
Graphic: Map showing transition markers on I-270 between Parshall Road and Dunn Road, road closures on either side of Graham Road and North Hanley, and road closures on all lanes merging onto I-170.
Slide 17
Traffic Control Plans
- Get In - Get Out - Stay Out - Phase 2
Graphic: Map showing transition markers on I-270 between Parshall Road and Dunn Road, a road closure on Dunn Road, and road closures on 2 lanes merging onto I-170.
Slide 18
Possible Alternate Routes
Graphic: Map showing construction zones along I-270 and I-170 and alternative routes drivers may take to avoid these construction zones.
Slide 19
Graphic: Map showing the I-270 north bound detour route, I-270 south bound detour route, the I-270/I-170 interchange lane closures through mid-May 2002, and through late 2003.
Slide 20
Stage 1 Alternative Analysis Summary
The table below compares Phase 1 construction conditions in the east bound and west bound lanes to existing conditions.
2 Lanes EB 3 Lanes WB | 3 Lanes EB 2 Lanes WB | 3 Lanes EB 2 Lanes WB Close New Florissant & Hanley On Ramps | 3 Lanes EB 2 Lanes WB Close Hanley On & Off Ramps | Reversible Lanes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EB LOS | Worse than Existing Conditions | Better than Existing Conditions | Better than Existing Conditions | Better than Existing Conditions | Better than Existing Conditions |
WB LOS | Same as Existing Conditions | Degraded but Acceptable Conditions | Same as Existing Conditions | Same as Existing Conditions | Same as Existing Conditions |
Slide 21
Stage 2 Alternatives Analysis Summary
The table below compares Phase 2 construction conditions in the east bound and west bound lanes to existing conditions.
2 Lanes EB 3 Lanes WB | 3 Lanes EB 2 Lanes WB | 3 Lanes EB 2 Lanes WB Florissant On-Ramp Closed | 3 Lanes EB 2 Lanes WB Hanley Off- Ramp Closed | Reversible Lanes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EB LOS | Degraded but Acceptable Conditions | Same as Existing Conditions | Same as Existing Conditions | Same as Existing Conditions | Same as Existing Conditions |
WB LOS | Same as Existing Conditions | Degraded but Acceptable Conditions | Same as Existing Conditions | Same as Existing Conditions | Same as Existing Conditions |
Slide 22
Innovative Methods & Contracting
- A+B+C Bidding Process
- Incentives / Disincentives
- Construction Staging & Scheduling
- Materials and Methods Used
Slide 23
Operations is Key to Success
- Work Zone Appearance & Signing
- Work Zone Activities
- Real Time Information and Guidance
- Traffic Incident Management (TIM)
Slide 24
Real Time Information & Guidance
See Gateway Guide Program at www.GatewayGuide.com
Slide 25
Web Site Information - Incidents and Events
Real-Time Traveler Information on the Internet
Graphic: Screen capture of the www.GatewayGuide.com web site.
Slide 26
Information Distribution
Media Connection
- Private Partner - Provides Center Operations including connection to major TV stations and connection to radio stations
- Incident or Event Alert Broadcasted
- Television Station Connection to Cameras
- Daily Construction Updates - Email or Faxed
- Weekly Construction Activities
Slide 27
Daily and Weekly Construction Activities
Graphic: Web site screen capture showing example construction activities (taken from the St Louis Area, Missouri Department of Transportation):
Links to the following are displayed:
- 2003 St. Louis Highway Construction Guide
- National Work Zone Awareness Week April 7-11
- Hot Topics and Projects
- Road Construction
- Gateway Guide
- The New I-64
- News Releases
- Regional Issues
Slide 28
Traffic Incident Management
Graphic: Photo of two road service patrol vehicles.
Slide 29
PM Rush Hour 1 Week After Switch
Graphic: Photo of the I-170 at I-270 Interchange after construction. There is no congestion on either interstate.
Slide 30
Morning Rush Hour
7:45 AM Friday, October 11, 2002
I-270 looking west from pedestrian bridge
Graphic: Photo showing work zone and steady flow of traffic
Slide 31
Inform Impacted Travelers
- Prior to Construction Beginning
- Ongoing and During Construction
- Major Traffic Changes
- After Completion
Slide 32
Informational Opportunities
- Community Involvement
- Business Meeting
- Fliers & Brochures
- Media Releases
- Keep Me In the Loop E-mails
- Advance Notification with Signs
Slide 33
Media Coverage
- Held a News conference one week prior to the closure.
- Three TV stations and the Post-Dispatch attended the conference.
- The Post Dispatch ran three separate articles on the closures between April 15 and April 21.
- Conducted live interviews with two TV stations the morning of the closure.
- Coverage of the closures appeared on all TV and radio stations on Monday, April 22.
Slide 34
Lessons Learned
- Community Makes Hard Decisions
- Keep information flowing throughout project
- "Get In - Get Out - Stay Out" most favored
- Innovative Contracting Works! Examples include A+B+C, Lane Rentals, and Closure Fees
- Adjust Traffic Control for Construction
Slide 35
Smart Work Zone Deployment
Investigation Of Smart Work Zone Technology:
- High Speed Approach to Work Zone
- Transition from Rural Area to Suburban Area
- Reverse Traffic Flow from Back-ups
- Advanced Notification System
- Improved Highway Safety
Slide 36
Smart Work Zone Deployment
Partners in Deployment:
- Midwest Smart Work Zone (5 States Research)
- University of Missouri - Research
- Quixote - IntelliZone System
- St. Louis District - MoDOT
Slide 37
Smart Work Zone Deployment
Graphic: Setup of System Implementation showing placement of 6 groundhog detectors, a mobile command unit, and 2 variable message signs (VMS).
Slide 38
Smart Work Zone Deployment
Methodology of Evaluation
Driver Survey that includes collection methods. Collection methods include the following:
- Interview—completed at gas stations, intersections
- Mail-back—handed out at intersection south of overpass
101 surveys collected, 62 interviewed, 39 mail-backs (120 handed out to drivers)
Slides 39 and 40
Smart Work Zone Deployment
Methodology of Evaluation
Driver Survey Results:
What did the message signs cause you to do?
- Slow down: 66.3%
- Change your route: 3.6%
- Did not affect your driving: 16.9%
- Other: 13.3%
What type of vehicle were you driving?
- Tractor trailer: 0.0%
- Truck/SUV: 35.7%
- Passenger car: 40.8%
- Other: 23.5%
Were you able to read the entire message?
- Yes: 77.6%
- No: 22.4%
Were you able to understand the message?
- Yes: 95.3%
- No: 4.7%
Margin of error: ~ +-10%
Slide 41
Smart Work Zone Deployment
Conclusions from Driver Survey
- Almost all drivers understood what message the variable message signs were trying to convey
- Most drivers slowed down as a result of seeing the variable message signs (66.3%)
Answers and questions
Thank you, Tom Ryan