Improving Business Processes for More Effective Transportation Systems Management and OperationsChapter 1: Introduction1.1 Managing Congestion with Transportation Systems Management and OperationsCongestion and delay on the road network are common attributes in today's transportation systems, particularly in urban areas and often during peak driving times such as morning or afternoon commutes. When travel conditions are worse than expected (from random or unusual circumstances like a crash, work zones, planned special events (PSEs), or bad weather), these conditions directly affect the networks' reliability that travelers may have come to expect. An important focus for many local and state transportation agencies, as well as the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), is to better manage and operate a transportation system to improve travel reliability. Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSMO) is defined as integrated strategies to optimize the performance of existing infrastructure through the implementation of multimodal and intermodal, cross-jurisdictional systems, services, and projects designed to preserve capacity and improve security, safety, and reliability of the transportation system management. A strong link exists between how the transportation system is managed and operated, and how reliable it is to the users of the system (for example, motorists and shippers).1 To fully appreciate and build on this link, decision makers and agency managers must understand that the effectiveness and long-term sustainability of any Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSMO) strategy depends on the supportive nature of the agency’s business processes devoted to implementing TSMO programs. TSMO is focused on actively managing and improving the transportation network by bringing together partner agencies, systems, and operational strategies as part of an integrated program and overall operational philosophy. Examples of TSMO strategies include traffic incident management (TIM), road weather management, and freeway traffic management. Many agencies are shaping their TSMO programs to more effectively address those planned and unplanned events that affect road and travel conditions and can have an effect on overall system reliability. Through improved business processes, practices, and policies, agencies can collaborate and implement more effective operations strategies that help minimize the effects of those events on the transportation system. This Primer, which has been developed under the Second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP2) L01 (Businesses Processes for Reliability), provides information on these business practices as they relate to the aforementioned TSMO strategies. Operational strategies alone will not solve the congestion management challenge. Effective business processes must be a key part of the institutional environment. 1.2 Business Processes1.2.1 Why Focus on Business Processes?Effective business processes are essential in supporting an effective and sustainable TSMO program. They reflect leadership support, internal and external cooperation, and fiscal efficiency and responsibility, as well as placing a priority on an overall ''customer service' approach. Business processes for TSMO are different than for traditional transportation agency functions of design, construction, and maintenance. Many agencies today face budget challenges, staffing and resource shortfalls, increased competition for project dollars, and potential customer satisfaction issues because of increasing travel delays experienced on transportation networks. The key to innovative partnering strategies, purposeful strategic planning for short- and long-term system management needs, identifying resource requirements and how those resource needs could be addressed is through effective business processes. Research shows that agencies with strong commitments to business processes—such as programming, procurement, staffing, planning, and collaboration—have demonstrated benefits of improved system management and operations.2 Business processes are challenging because no two agencies or regions are alike. Each agency has its own institutional policies, rules, culture, and structure. Although some standards are in place that help to promote consistency (such as procurement requirements), each agency executes its processes differently. As a result, when looking at business processes, each agency may have a set of unique requirements and approaches and a unique set of stakeholders that will need to be involved. 1.2.2 The Role of Business Processes in a TSMO ProgramBusiness processes, in the context of TSMO, refers to activities such as planning, programming, agency project development processes, and those organizational aspects that govern various technical or administrative activities (such as training, human resource management, or agreements). Business processes get at the heart of many of the organizational issues that can influence TSMO. In many cases, the business process elements go beyond the day-to-day operational activities, and require broader institutional support and involvement. Aspects such as training, contracting, and procurement, or information technology policies, might be well outside of the sphere of influence or control of the groups that are involved in the hands-on, daily transportation system operations and management. Business processes, like planning, programming, training, or establishment of partnerships and agreements, are fundamental to the success of operational and management activities. The lack of effective business processes for TSMO can also hinder an agency's ability or readiness to advance to more complex and proactive operational strategies (such as variable speed limits, advance traffic management and information systems, and dynamic parking management). Without the right procurement processes, partnering commitments, sustainable funding, internal awareness and support, an agency would have limited capacity to implement more complex TSMO programs and activities. 1.2.3 Benefits of Improved Business ProcessesThe following are several benefits in implementing improved business processes into transportation systems:
1.2.4 Impacts of Ineffective Business ProcessesThe following are ineffective business processes that can impact transportation systems planning:
1.2.5 Business Process Improvement Examples from Other IndustriesTwo case studies—United Parcel Service (UPS) and Charleston (South Carolina) Water Systems (CWS), a water utility company—provide a successful example of how improved and integrated key business processes helped them reach their goals. Both case studies provide evidence that considering and analyzing underlying business processes can and do work to improve operations and produce monetary and efficiency benefits to the organization. 1.2.5.1. United Parcel ServiceIn 2011, UPS underwent a business processes transformation to shift from being a primarily U.S.-based, small package-focused business to becoming an end-to-end global operation that can handle the needs of companies worldwide. UPS took a variety of approaches to ensure that their business and management processes were compatible with their new vision and goal. One initiative was to create a centralized process group called the Program Management Group – Process Center for Excellence, whose task was to ensure that the company stayed process-oriented. This group also was tasked with documenting, reviewing, and standardizing processes. They also worked with the American Productivity and Quality Center to become experts at benchmarking. As a result, they developed a framework known as the Core Process Framework. Their goal for this framework was to have metrics and scorecards available so they could benchmark UPS process management against what other companies were doing, so they may continually improve and elevate their process maturity. UPS changed their business plan and approach by implementing a 'We Love Logistics' campaign to emphasize that the company was explicitly aware of the full set of logistics behind their end-to-end process of package transport in the global arena. As a result of these efforts to become—and be seen as—process-oriented, UPS now operates in 200 countries and has vastly expanded their shipping capabilities. They have established their process analysis as a core value in the company and trained more than 700 of their employees worldwide in creating process maps for analysis and process improvements. Overall, their focus on business process improvements has allowed them to outgrow the confines of the small-package business and become a truly globalized company. 1.2.5.2. Charleston Water SystemCWS oversees one water treatment plant and two wastewater treatment plants in South Carolina that serve approximately 400,000 customers. CWS was treating excess water in its wastewater collection system because rain and groundwater were entering the system through cracks and cross-connections. CWS set out to address the problem by improving predictive maintenance and investigations so that effective infrastructure improvements could be made. To achieve this goal, CWS used a combination of management frameworks and business practice tools to analyze their water treatment system and ultimately reduce waste and improve their operations' overall efficiency and effectiveness. CWS applied different components of Lean Six Sigma process and project efficiency toolkits.3 For example, they implemented mentoring and training programs for a multidisciplinary project team to ensure the team properly understood the Lean Six Sigma processes. They also established process goals and metrics—including value stream mapping, statistical process quality control and variation analyses, cause-and-effect diagrams, and root-cause analysis problem solving—to measure progress and results of their process changes. By using these process tools and analyses, CWS recommended improvements that were implemented and subsequently adopted within CWS operations. After CWS implemented the recommended improvements, the company was able to increase its wastewater treatment capacity by 2.62 million gallons per day and see a savings of $1.3 million per year in operations and maintenance costs. CWS also realized a $9.17 million fee savings from their increased treatment capacity. The efforts to provide their operations with better performance data has helped CWS reach its goals of reducing waste and improving overall efficiency and effectiveness, which resulted in large-scale annual savings. 1.3 Primer Focus and AudienceThis primer is focused on helping transportation agencies accomplish the following goals:
This primer will help readers understand the context and role of business processes in a TSMO program. The primer differentiates supporting business processes—including program planning, procurement, and resource allocation—from those operational activities typically associated with TSMO, yet it makes a firm connection between business processes and operations functions. The following audiences will benefit from the concepts presented in this primer:
Because this primer highlights different nonrecurring congestion business process issues, it also benefits multiple stakeholders within an agency. The primer also benefits agency partners, including transportation system maintenance managers, regional planning organizations, senior law enforcement representatives (particularly those involved in TIM and PSE programs), and those entities involved in agency administrative functions, including contracting and procurement, information technology, and training. 1.4 Primer OrganizationThis primer is organized into the following key sections:
1 Second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP2). 2013. A Framework for Improving Travel Time Reliability. SHRP2 L17 Final Report. Available at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2prepubL17.pdf. June. [Note: This publication asserts that reliability can be improved through the application of TSMO strategies, because these strategies focus directly on the root causes of unreliable travel, such as incidents, weather impacts, and work zones.] 2 Second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP2).2012. Institutional Architectures to Improve Systems Operations and Management. SHRP2 L06. SHRP2 Report S2-L06-RR-1. Available at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_S2-L06-RR-1.pdf. Prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff, Delcan, Philip J. Tarnoff, George Mason University School of Public Policy, and Housman and Associates. Prepared for Transportation Research Board, Second Strategic highway Research Program, Washington, D.C. 3 Lean Six Sigma comprises process improvement and process efficiency approaches that promote more efficient, streamlined ways to collaborate, reduce lags in projects and process implementation, and improve how tasks and work are accomplished.
|
United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration |